For Gadgets 2.0, we have custom content models that represent
JavaScript and CSS pages. Comparing the exact content model here
is too strict, when we really want to know if the page supports
the JavaScript or CSS formats.
Also fix a debug log comment that didn't work due to improper quoting.
Change-Id: I64e86c74173b1c88cac71483327cacdd8b9967b9
return null;
}
- $model = $content->getModel();
-
- if ( $model !== CONTENT_MODEL_CSS && $model !== CONTENT_MODEL_JAVASCRIPT ) {
- wfDebugLog( 'resourceloader', __METHOD__ . ': bad content model $model for JS/CSS page!' );
+ if ( $content->isSupportedFormat( CONTENT_FORMAT_JAVASCRIPT ) ) {
+ return $content->serialize( CONTENT_FORMAT_JAVASCRIPT );
+ } elseif ( $content->isSupportedFormat( CONTENT_FORMAT_CSS ) ) {
+ return $content->serialize( CONTENT_FORMAT_CSS );
+ } else {
+ wfDebugLog( 'resourceloader', __METHOD__ . ": bad content model {$content->getModel()} for JS/CSS page!" );
return null;
}
-
- return $content->getNativeData(); //NOTE: this is safe, we know it's JS or CSS
}
/* Methods */